Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beechdean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob ert  15:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Beechdean
Blatant advertising. Created by Andreruss who has contributed nothing else and which looks like an amalgam of the founders' names (Andrew and Susie Howard). Seem to have forgotten their password because editing continued by Ice cream who has contributed nothing else. (I am prepared to be told they are notable even so - but we should not support their guerrilla marketing practises. Meanwhile, Beechdean hasn't the funds to advertise on television. They turn to guerrilla marketing to promote themselves. ) -- RHaworth 18:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP, and the article doesn't make a case for its notability otherwise.  -- E lkman - (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and E lkman - (talk)--Tollwutig 19:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Articles like this make me laugh. Aplomado - UTC 23:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advert. I did have to revert page blanking. Stifle (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.