Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beekrumsing Ramlallah State Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Beekrumsing Ramlallah State Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This school doesn't seem notable. Since all the sources in the article are primary except for one (which isn't about the school or in-depth), I couldn't find any sources in a BEFORE that would pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG, and secondary schools are not inherently notable per the RfC about them. Given the irrelevance of SCHOOLOUTCOMES for secondary schools and that WP:BIAS is an essay, it would be good if keep arguments were about the actual guidelines and sourcing (or lack there of) per WP:AFDEQ. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per WP:NSCHOOL, schools are not inherently notable and need to pass WP:GNG; this school doesn't pass Spiderone  08:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article does not pass GNG or NORG. BEFORE showed only sparse routine run of the mill local coverage, nothing that establishes notability. The references in the article does not meet IS or SIGCOV  // Timothy ::  talk  00:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL, WP:SIGCOV, and my own standards for secondary schools. This seems to be an ordinary secondary school, one of over 50 on Mauritius. Since there is lack of significant coverage, we'd have to delete it. It only has 4/10 of my factors for secondary school notability, less than the 7/10 I would prefer. Bearian (talk) 17:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Although I'd seriously question a few of the standards, your 10 point notability system seems at least a little more resonable then whatever the "keep every school article, because school" crowd has going. Have you thought about doing an RfC about it? Because while I'm fine with the current standards of the GNG and NORG for schools, more specific guidelines would be a good thing and maybe it would help tamp down the angry mob some if they were a little more strict, or at least actually catered to schools. Adamant1 (talk) 18:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.