Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beeman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. --Sam Blanning(talk) 12:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Beeman
This was PRODed as "nn company", Google returns over 1.5 million hits for "Beeman", the vast majority false positives. However, "Beeman Airguns" returns over 29K hits, and "Beeman Precision Airguns" returns almost a thousand. It seems to me that this may be a leading company in a niche industry. No vote Dsmdgold 14:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC) ''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' Sam Blanning(talk) 13:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems to be notable within a niche industry. Stifle (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Google shows them to be notable enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand.-- blue 520  16:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename to "Beeman Precision Airguns", as the vast majority of pages for Beeman are false positives.--Prosfilaes 04:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.