Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beemos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  01:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Beemos

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This operating system hasn't been released yet, and is still in its Beta stage, which means that it's not (yet?) notable. A ecis Brievenbus 00:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly speedy A7 per WP:WEB. It doesn't assert that the operating system is notable. Kesac (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * A7 doesn't apply to this, per WP:CSD: "A7 applies only to articles about web content or articles on people and organizations themselves, not articles on their books, albums, software and so on." (Italics added for emphasis) A  ecis Brievenbus 10:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete reliable sources cover false positives from, at the most recent, 1952 and ghits barely confirm its existence. I'm finding MySpace and false positives, I find barely anything to verify, let alone assert notability. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 13:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no assertion of notability (no, being some guy's hobby doesn't count ;)). -- Mark Chovain 05:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mark Chovain. Cricketgirl (talk) 09:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.