Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer rebates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus that this is not worthy of an article, no consensus to redirect.  Sandstein  07:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Beer rebates

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unable to find any coverage of this particular phenomenon in reliable sources. Fails verifiability and notability. Unless significant rationales are offered here, I oppose the creation of of a redirect as there is no significant coverage of the subject in Rebate (marketing), nor ought there to be given the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Bongo  matic  07:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I honestly can't think of any real reason to have this redirect to rebate. It's not like there's a redirect for phrases such as "food rebate", so why would there need to be one for "beer rebate"? Anything that's covered in this article is pretty redundant since it's the same thing that's generally covered in rebate but with beer terms added.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Even terms such as "merchandise rebate" and "electronics rebate" don't redirect to anything and they're more likely to be searched than "beer rebate" will be. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 *  Delete Redirect It sounds plausible, but there's no indication that that there's anything significant about these rebates, as opposed to any other kind of rebate. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 10:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rebate (marketing). While the blog post is not a reliable source, I think it does indicate that "beer rebate" is a plausible search term. That other possible search terms are not already redirects does not mean this one should not be. (Maybe some of them should exist as well.) Lady  of  Shalott  12:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect & merge to Rebate (marketing). This is one of thousands of rebate types, should not be an article. North8000 (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - A couple blog posts don't constitute anything remotely resembling notability and there is no precedent for a limitless number of ("product + rebate") redirects to rebate. No sofa rebate, coffee maker rebate, television rebate, stereo rebate, tire rebate, salsa rebate, swimwear rebate, cookie rebate, dog toy rebate, ad infinitum. So this is a straight delete, to my way of thinking. Be advised that I have nothing against either beer or rebates... Carrite (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It sounds like a great offer. However WP can't have an article on every marketing campaign that happens. Also this one might not last too long. Borock (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.