Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beez von Beezen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 06:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Beez von Beezen
Some anon nominated this for deletion and didn't specify why. I'm completing the process. Abstain. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 10:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Clean-up - it needs cleaning more than deleting. If it's notable enough for Norway's Wiki then, as I have learned from a recent failed deletion nominaion, it is notable enough for the English version. doktorb | words 11:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain. I cleaned up the article as best I could with the information available.  Unfortunately I was not able to find any references in English and the only ones that were provided originally were in Swedish.  There are a few German references, but nothing directly supporting the article that I could see (my german is not very good).  Movementarian 23:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article is the work of Innaa who is Norwegian and not very familiar with Wikipedia. He was blocked for 24 hours yesterday for attaching AfD templates to blatantly meritworthy articles. He has just emailed me to demand his contributions be deleted: 'We then ask you to DELETE all the pages in our own box of pages names "innaa".' I have tried to explain to him the GFDL. David | Talk 00:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep with rename - I just looked at the high-res version of the portrait, and it confirms most of the biography of Christof Beezen, though not the bit about being ennobled as Beez von Beezen. Though it'd have to be Delete if the poster takes his ball home and removes the verifying image. Tearlach 03:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.