Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begzada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was retracted, keep as rewritten. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Begzada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hopelessly messed-up article about a poorly defined subject: is this supposed to be an Indian caste/tribe/whatever? Or a title of nobility? Literally it just means "son of a Bey". Largely unreadable in its present state. Sole contributor knows no English and has no notion of reliable sourcing. Nothing of what is currently in the article is salvagable. Might be a legitimate topic if rewritten entirely, but search for good sources is made exceedingly difficult (for a non-expert) by the fact that many google hits are simply to individuals who happen to share this name, and the fact that the actual intended topic appears to be unclear. What reliable sources I've been able to find seemed to be talking about a class of Kurdish nobility, not about Indian rajputs as the lead sentence states. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:49, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, the topic is legitimate but scarcely researched.-- — ZjarriRrethues — talk 09:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the rewrite; this new article is of course keepable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.