Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behenein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn. Reasonable shape, notability doesn't seem to be a problem. – sgeureka t•c 14:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Behenein

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Very incomplete. Should this be a speedy? delete if not speedy. UtherSRG (talk) 03:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * comment - the state of the article when I AFD'd it was quite different. I withdraw my delete vote.keep - UtherSRG (talk) 12:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 12:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 12:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment That's not a deletion rationale. It's a verifiable article about a television show. No idea whether the show itself is notable, but the producer is: . cab (talk) 12:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sodabottle and the newspaper sources I added to the article. Appears to pass WP:N. And again, "incomplete" is not a proper deletion rationale: WP:NOEFFORT, WP:UGLY, etc. are all surmountable problems given that reliable source coverage exists. cab (talk) 12:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable soap in Star Plus. Has had enough coverage - Screen Weekly, DNA, Indian Express. It is a new soap and as Hindi soaps in one of the popular Hindi channels in India, will get reams written on it. --Sodabottle (talk) 12:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.