Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beijing Yuji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 21:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Beijing Yuji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am concerned that this may not meet the criteria for inclusion, does not appear to be a noted company - establish only in 2005, I cannot locate noted third-party information on the company, internet searches reveal only a plethora of indexing websites, the company's own website, and their facebook page. I may be missing something, so want to open it up to the community at AfD. S.G.(GH) ping! 13:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The "CompoundSemiconductor" reference in the article is the strongest but the company is just listed there as one of the "other players" in its field. Aside from patent assignations I haven't found anything else that would indicate that this firm passes WP:CORPDEPTH (though happy to revise opinion if someone finds strong Chinese references for example). AllyD (talk) 08:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing anything that would get this past WP:GNG.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.