Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Being There Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Note that a number of articles currently have external links to this magazine's website, which may or may not require cleanup (not sure). —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-02 06:56Z 

Being There Magazine

 * — (View AfD)

Procedural nomination; was prodded twice. I concur with the last prod reason, "nn online magazine, alexa of 1,507,874". Per the talk page: Writing about famous celebrities is so common, thousands of other magazines, publications, and even students do it, but that makes none of them notable. Apparently, neither is this magazine, with a paucity of reliable sources:. Kimchi.sg 05:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN magazine. TJ Spyke 06:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- WP:NOT Tonytypoon 08:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Fails WP:WEB. MER-C 08:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. —ShadowHalo 08:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep magazine is at least as notable, if not moreso, than other webzines with entries on Wikipedia. Multiple substantive interviews with noted figures cited. 10dutcher 04:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interviewing the famous doesn't transfer the fame of the interviewee to the interviewer. Hell, I once interviewed Douglas Adams, and that didn't make me or the college radio program I did it for worth an article or even mildly notable. --Calton | Talk 00:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.