Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Being money


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Being money

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable YouTube video. Prod declined without comment. The "reception" section speaks for itself in terms of lack of notability: " over 200 hits as of mid 2009". Delete. Hairhorn (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. A YouTube video isn't notable unless it has been WIDELY mentioned in independent, relevant sources. McMarcoP (talk) 09:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quick google search reveals nothing. Manish EarthTalk •  Stalk 10:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * response edits were done with comments - user removed all external links to youtube. in addition, what is officially classified as "non-notable?"  I believe we are all talking subjectively and based on opinion.  The facts are that this is an actual video shown on youtube.  Jimbomaniaz01 (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * "Actually existing" falls far short of the standards of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 23:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * as it states in the standards of notability "It is important to note that a notability determination does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbomaniaz01 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you'll have to come up with some reason your video is notable. "It exists" doesn't cut it. Hairhorn (talk) 02:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. You might want to find sources (in print or - better because easier to verify - online) stating the relevance of the video - not simply its existence. Coverage in major publications should do, blogs/Facebook/Myspace don't. Local news are debatable. McMarcoP (talk) 08:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.