Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Being the Further of the Adventures of a Woman of Pleasure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 23:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Being the Further of the Adventures of a Woman of Pleasure

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an imaginary book title in a movie. Not notable on its own and offers no context outside of the movie. I first req. a merge, original contributor didn't seem interested, so here we are. Pharmboy 14:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as far as I can tell, this is not a fictional book, but an upcoming book (or part of one). Sources are scarce and effectively limited to the quotes given in the article, and I doubt "Being the Further ..." is really going to be the title. Currently fails WP:N, WP:RS, WP:FICTION (in case it really is fictional), WP:NOT (otherwise). Huon 22:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Appears the nom is a bit off, but was based on the actual article at the time nom was made, which says it an imaginary book named in the movie Pharmboy 23:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * As the original author of this article, yes I totally agree it should be deleted. But not wishing to be a pain, I want to correct a few points in the previous postings; the article is about a fictional book extracts of which will be appearing in a _graphic novel_ not a movie as the above contributor has suggested, it's called "League of Extraordiary Gentlemen: Black Dossier", AT NO POINT IN ANY VERSION OF THIS ARTICLE WAS THERE ANY INDICATION THAT THIS ARTICLE WAS REFFERING TO A MOVIE, there is plenty of information about Black Dossier both on and off the web, e.g. I have a page at http://www.comp.dit.ie/dgordon/League/loeg0025.html, just google "Black Dossier", it's coming out Oct 2007. The title "Being the Further of the Adventures of a Woman of Pleasure" is totally correct and will not changed as some of the above contributors have suggested, this graphic novel is completed, and I have personally seen the title as is in proofs. Anyway to cut a short story long, yes, it should be deleted, thanks for the discussion Damiantgordon 00:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC) damiantgordon


 * Keep It's no different than having a page on a single-issue comic (of which Wikipedia has plenty) and furthermore, the fact that the nom has no idea what he's talking about really bugs me. Kuralyov 01:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If you check the article history at the time the nom was made, it all gets a bit clearer. Pharmboy 12:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Again I don't want to be a pain, but all this article history shows is that at the time the nom was made it was stated that this fiction book was appearing in LoEG: Black Dossier, clicking on the link would lead to the main "LoEG (Comic)" page. Damiantgordon 15:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC) damiantgordon


 * Comment I just noticed that the only source I found is hosted under http://www.comp.dit.ie/dgordon/, showing a possible conflict of interest given that the page was created by Damiantgordon. --Huon 15:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Original contributer requested delete See above.  He has politely requested delete, so the issue seems a bit moot.  Pharmboy 19:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor element in upcoming comic book based on a flight of fancy by Alan Moore. Utterly not in need of an article, this would serve much better as a redirect. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.