Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beings (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Beings (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Direct to video film, does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep First of all, it's not required for a movie to be widely-released or released in theaters to have a stand-alone article here. Second, I added sources that prove that the article was reviewed by independent sources.--SirEdimon (talk) 03:30, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - it's consensus that terrible films (it got a 33 % on Rotten Tomatoes) can be notable. On the other hand, it didn't get a lot of reviews. Bearian (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, I normally create articles about "terrible" films (or less known films) and I rarely have issues. Normally, if a film was reviewed by media outlets it's considered "notable" even when (like in this specific case) the film is just awful.--SirEdimon (talk) 02:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Cast is notable enough for retention. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Only one review by a reliable source (not Tofu Nerdpunk). It just wasn't good or bad enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep bad films are notable too. Lightburst (talk) 03:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.