Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bejeweled Blitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No worthwhile info to merge. Not significantly different from host article to create redirect ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 22:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Bejeweled Blitz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No evidence of notability, no references, no third party sources but mostly per WP:NOTMANUAL. Magioladitis (talk) 14:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge any relevant content into the parent Bejeweled article - this subtype of game doesn't need it's own page and redirect Bejeweled Blitz to Bejeweled. Exxolon (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am ok if we keep it as redirect but which info is worth in there? -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge notable series, but pretty much all the content just describes the various power-ups and so on, not really an encyclopedia article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – It's not even worth merging this information anywhere. Wikipedia is not a game guide. I won't oppose to someone writing an encyclopedic version, but this is not acceptable, at least to my standards. –MuZemike 17:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No independent notability from the parent game, Bejeweled. One of many variants of the game. --Teancum (talk) 01:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.