Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bekah Ferguson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Bekah Ferguson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not seem to me to meet notability criteria of WP:BIO. I can't find any reviews or mentions of the works aside from promotional info. RJASE1 Talk  03:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Why is my article pending deletion? I don't really understand, but I would like to fix it so that the article can remain.

Thanks for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djrobbief (talk • contribs) 03:49, 20 February 2007
 * Comment please refer to WP:COI, WP:OWN and WP:SOAP. Ohconfucius 02:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Note to the previous commenter: please sign your posts " ~ " so that we know who you are. This is a typical case of a fan's bio, or an autobiography, of a non-notable figure who thinks she's notable because she published some books.  See the details at WP:BIO.  There may not be much of a way to improve the article if the facts are what they are. YechielMan 05:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. janejellyroll 05:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:V by end of this AfD Alf photoman 13:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Titles published by a vanity publisher. Victoriagirl 22:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. A vanity publisher is a company that charges authors to publish their book. The books in question appear to be published by the author and her husband, rather than a vanity publisher. If multiple reviews or articles about the author from reliable sources can be found, then she would be notable. --Eastmain 02:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I see no indication that Rock of Ages Publishing is anything but a vanity press. Victoriagirl 04:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Believe it or not, a few standard books have been published what is called vanity publishers, the question is not what type of publisher put out a book but how many have actually been sold and how does that figure relate to comparable books published by standard publishers Alf photoman 22:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * While I'm afraid I don't know what is meant by "standard books", I believe my comment concerning Rock of Ages Publishing has been misconstrued. In no way do I believe that self-published and vanity press books should be disregarded, rather I argue that they should be recognized for what they are: publications paid for by the author. I think this fact is relevant to any AfD consideration... as are sales, influence and profile. Victoriagirl 23:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Also appears to fail WP:COI: author is Djrobbief, and husband of subject is one Robbie Ferguson. He also attempted to hijack the page Rebecca Smith. Ohconfucius 02:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.