Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bekir Yıldırım


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 03:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Bekir Yıldırım

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources in this article are to various issues of a government gazette that list Mr. Yildirim in promotions lists. A BEFORE search turns up no additional sources. DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep a judge at the level he served would seem to be notable. Government documents can be used to show a position in the government.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Just a note, the Supreme Court of Appeals in Turkey has 150 judges at any one time, who serve 10-year terms. Despite its lofty name, it's an intermediate-level appellate tribunal. There are literally thousands of living Turkish jurists who have sat on it. DarjeelingTea (talk) 05:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly a senior enough judge for an article. However many judges it has, it is the highest court of appeal in the land. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.