Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bekka Eaton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kevin (talk) 23:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Bekka Eaton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. IMDB reveals a non extensive acting career. passing mentions in gnews but not enough in depth coverage. LibStar (talk) 01:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per coverage meeting WP:GNG for her many diverse works over at least 28 years. Yes, the article needs to be cleaned up and better sourced... but sources are available for such and surmoutable issues should be addressed through normal editing, and not by deletion because someone else has not done the work.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep article needs wikification, but she is modestly notable.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep. Barely passes WP:GNG. Tisane (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.