Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bel-Korhadris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, lacking real world notability. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Bel-Korhadris

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There are no sources independent of Games Workshop to demonstrate notability of this fictional character. Any information is solely a summary of primary sources. --Craw-daddy &#124; T &#124; 19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   —--Craw-daddy &#124; T &#124; 19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —--Craw-daddy &#124; T &#124; 19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not indicate any real-world significance of this fictional game element. It also appears to be original research based on primary source material. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Serious question, how is it WP:OR if it's based on primary sources? Hobit (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Good question. The two are not necessarily incompatible. Generally, things inferred or interpreted from examination of primary sources are original research, in contrast to things reported from those sources. In the absence of source citation, it is hard to say whether something is "just made up," or original research, or factual reportage. I am probably guilty of undue skepticism in this case, but the lack of references (and, to a lesser extent, the abandonment of real-world perspective after the first sentence) invites skepticism. ~ Ningauble (talk) 13:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.