Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus–Belgium relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Belarus–Belgium relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random country pairing Google news search doesn't reveal much. LibStar (talk) 04:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Isn't it likely that two European countries are likely to have some level of notable relations? Something more than a quick google news search may be required here. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's likely Belgium has spoken out against human rights abuses in Belarus, but it might have done so only in the EU framework, in which case Belarus and the European Union would be a better place to handle this. And while I agree it's more likely for European countries to interact, one should keep in mind that one is an advanced Western democracy, and the other a Brezhnev-era relic far more oriented toward Russia (although that too is a sometimes testy relationship). Regardless, in the absence of sources or obvious factors like shared borders (not the case here), we should presume a lack of notability and delete. - Biruitorul Talk 16:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a collection of miscellaneous juxtapositions of countries, nor a directory of which do or do not exchange diplomats. Fails notability as well. Edison (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 10:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 10:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.