Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus–Cyprus relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 08:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Belarus–Cyprus relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

neither country has a resident ambassador despite having a few agreements including a trade one. there is little third party coverage of these agreements or actual bilateral relations. . they played a friendly football match last year which I know at least 1 editor would think this helps add notability. clearly not. LibStar (talk) 07:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm beginning to think that the existence of resident ambassadors or the existence of hostile relations, are good filtering metrics for these kinds of articles. Shadowjams (talk) 08:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No actual notability is demonstrated....and a soccer game won't change that. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —Cdogsimmons (talk) 14:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to appropriate foreign relations articles. Not enough notability for stand-alone article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject of the article is not notable per WP:NOTE so fails one of the basic principles of Wikipedia. Drawn Some (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into one of the following articles: Belarus' foreign policy towards Cyprus or Cyprus' foreign policy towards Belarus. Soldiers naysayed by Norw.-speakers (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * neither article exists. LibStar (talk) 06:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Simply nothing to this... and this coming from a hardcore international football fan. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  05:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources discuss these relations. Fails WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 09:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I've noticed this has been tagged for rescue but zero effort has been made to improve this article in 7 days. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.