Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus–Finland relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Belarus–Finland relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination, non resident embassies. most of the talking happens in a Belarus-EU context, as the Finnish foreign ministry reveals. . google news search shows up mostly multilateral and sporting relations. so a revised search shows only minor coverage and the usual double taxation agreement. LibStar (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete there is now a consensus on how to handle these. JJL (talk) 03:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent coverage of the article topic as stated by the title. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  15:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foreign relations of Belarus which now holds the content - think this is the consensus. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * First line is "Finland–Belarus relations are foreign relations between Finland and Albania" (my emphasis). Delete. Clearly the creator's only intention was to generate yet another article without a care for notability or value added. Stifle (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Foreign relations of Belarus or Foreign relations of Finland. I already have began to merge this, so this AfD is about a redirect, not an article. Ikip (talk) 15:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete an unsourced stub (since it's unsourced there is nothing of value to "merge") about a relationship of so little value to the two counrties that neither keeps an embassy in the other's capital. Have no opposition to a redirect later but, of course, almost all of these are highly implausible search terms.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reasonable secondary sources adress this relationship. Hipocrite (talk) 04:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.