Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus at major beauty pageants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Daniel (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Belarus at major beauty pageants

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Additional articles:

On 31 July Articles for deletion/Belize at major beauty pageants closed as delete as a non notable list. This list was part of a series of articles about nations at major beauty pageants. Since these are, in my opinion, exactly the same notability wise I'm nominating all 146 articles that are part of that series (see Category:Nations at beauty pageants) for deletion in sets of 10 with a set per day to avoid overloading AFD with these articles. Pinging particpants to previous AFD:, , , , , --  Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  10:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. --  Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  10:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. --  Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  10:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. --  Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  10:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. --  Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  10:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment Brazil has blue links to articles, but those I clicked on are just unreferenced stubs. If any list are valid navigation list that make a list of those logically categorized together, then it would be worth keeping.  If the only links are to articles that will get deleted for not being notable, then the list have no reason to exist.   D r e a m Focus  10:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bolivia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration.  D r e a m Focus  10:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, this kind of indiscriminate collection of information is not Wikipedia is for.--  Chuka Chief talk 14:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per precedent, WP:NOTSTATS, and (according to Articles for deletion/Albania at major beauty pageants) WP:SYNTH and WP:FANCRUFT. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 16:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per wp:synth. References do not explicitly support the specific topics (WP article titles). And I agree that no stats is applicable. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all per precedent. WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection information with no notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. JBchrch   talk  10:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all - as per nom's rationale.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 14:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all We do not need these lists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.