Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belbase

Re: Belbase Substub about a nonnotable surname. RickK 00:05, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Concur- delete. This does point up, though, that we ought to have something on Arghakhachi and other divisions of Nepal.... -FZ 00:09, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve - This was VfD'd 2 minutes after creation .... How do you know the submitter was even done editing? -- Netoholic @ 00:14, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Tell, me Netoholic, what IS a good time to wait for an article to be listed on VfD? Five years?  Ten?  RickK 00:14, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Watching Special:Newpages for VfD candidates is not appropriate - invariably the articles will be bad first versions, and you're cutting apart new editors and probably discouraging them. Try Special:Randompage instead. -- Netoholic @ 07:13, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is a candidate for a speedy for being an article with no content that goes to an external link.  It is also like the "Bather" article in that it's a family vanity.  Finally, "Trolling" is a personal attack, Netoholic.  I'm sure you meant "trawling," but your choice of word could have been construed as an accusation that RickK is a disruptive and undesirable user, which is wholly inappropriate language. Geogre 04:21, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * And, by Netoholic's logic, should be deleted from this page. RickK 06:39, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Surname dictdef.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:22, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * It's been there a day, and is still a one line article going to an external link. Delete unless expanded by the end of the VfD period - a few days is more than enough time to write a decent stub. Average Earthman 09:16, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - surname is not encyclopedic - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:06, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there's an encyclopedia article here, someone can write it some day. Jallan 19:30, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)