Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belinda (Rice novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. closing early as there seems no doubt in the outcome and noone has said anything for 5 days Spartaz Humbug! 05:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Belinda (Rice novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Completing nomination for User:69.181.249.92, nomination is as follows: ''Contested prod with no explanation. Redirect to author's page reverted by the same editor, also with no explanation. Article has had no references for almost five years. It fails most of the notability criteria for books, the only possible exception being the fifth, "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable." I don't think that history has had sufficient time to judge Anne Rice's historical significance yet, so including this on that basis alone is premature. FWIW, I'm a fan of Rice but don't think this meets notability. Hut 8.5'' 09:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per fifth criteria.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm no Anne Rice expert whatsoever, but she's important enough an author that several books exist on her and her works. Surely substantial coverage exists.  And having articles on all her novels besides this one just seems silly anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:BK #5, easily. Tarc (talk) 19:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Shouldn't have been nominated. World famous author so all her books are notable. scope_creep (talk) 21:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. All Rice's novels have coverage sufficient to satisfy the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.