Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belitsoft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 15:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Belitsoft

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable small company; neither evidence nor assertion of notability (you don't "catch" notability by partnering with Microsoft) Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  02:04, 25 March 2010 (UTC) I beleive I should try to keep the article and first basis can be alternate criteria for commercial organizations, products and services described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COMPANY#Products_and_services. As I know from the company's site they have notable products SharePointLMS and JoomlaLMS. When the product is notable, the company can be considered notable too. Correct me when I'm wrong. The second basis is the attempt to improve the text and to find more interesting information about this company and its products and services. I know that when the information can be considered advertising, article is nominated for speedy deletion, please, advise may I add in the article information about its products SharePointLMS and JoomlaLMS and maybe awards of this company projetcs, services? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minsksky (talk • contribs) 15:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Keep - Again here is missed the products notability which is the basis to keep the article according to the wiki rules. Please, consider this. WP:PRODUCT Also this article has reliable secondary sourses references which is also the argument for to be kept on wiki.213.184.248.211 (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   Eastmain (talk • contribs)  03:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   Eastmain (talk • contribs)  03:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions.   Eastmain (talk • contribs)  03:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. The coverage related to the company selling its software to the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University might be worth something, but is probably not enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have added this article since I considered it to be notable. Belarus has little articles about its economy, industry, I tried to find something valuable and notable. Since there is a section Software companies of Belarus on wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Software_companies_of_Belarus, why not to try to find and add there notable things?
 * Delete per nomination. Yet another business to business tech/service outfit: provides software application  and systems development, re-engineering, testing, design, maintenance and support services.  A website they created ranked 8th in a competition. They have made a sale. They've collaborated with Microsoft to make sure that their offerings are compatible with Microsoft software. Nothing to take this outside the realm of the run of the mill. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Products mentioned are offered by Elearningforce, and their production only outsourced to Belitsoft. Notability not provided. Nageh (talk) 09:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Non notable company. The references are a mirage and don't say anything with regard to notability. Szzuk (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.