Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belize–Venezuela relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  17:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Belize–Venezuela relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article gives no information about the relations between the two countries other than when they were established. Only one reliable source covers this topic. Interstellarity (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BEFORE, meets WP:GNG. I will try to translate the Spanish version soon. --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Conditional Keep if article is expanded per NoonIcarus, merge/redirect back to Foreign relations of Venezuela otherwise given that the article has been a one-sentence stub for two years. I think this is a valid topic for a separate article, but recommend reading and applying WP:BEEF.  SnowFire (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment I have translated the content from Spanish and solved the existing cleanup tags. I could look for further information is needed. --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for expanding the article. Although in some cases deletion would be valid, it seems like in this case that not deleting the article is a perfectly reasonable outcome. I think most of the articles that I come across on Wikipedia would probably survive AFD. I think an article like Guinea–Israel relations, although it is a stub, would probably survive AFD since a quick Google search shows that the topic is covered in-depth in reliable sources. I will give WP:BEFORE a read before nominating any article which should guide me through doing my checks before nominating the item. Interstellarity (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sourcing is improved, thanks to User:NoonIcarus; however, this is still pure WP:SYN. Yilloslime (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per NoonIcarus. Extensive articles cover their relationship to each other. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.