Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell & Hudson Insurance Agency, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have an aversion to deleting anything 150 years old, whatever it is, but sadly this has to go...unless they can be shown to have done something notable like they insured the Titanic or invented cat insurance. SpinningSpark 19:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Bell & Hudson Insurance Agency, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Small business that has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Fails WP:GNG and Notability (organizations and companies) Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Hirolovesswords (talk) 04:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep - I added a reference to the article today and I'm working on finding microfiche newspaper articles from the early part of the 20th century. I'm asking for more time to find these records to support notability for this 150 year-old Massachusetts company.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 21:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely not notable; just another company. Whoisjohngalt added a reference (thanks), but that only brings them to 4, none of significance. Also, the article was created by an editor, Psingleton - contributions who seems to be adding a number of articles for small or not terribly significant companies. I'm a bit concerned about COI here. LaMona (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 14:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Appears to be an ordinary, local small business. I'm not seeing anything counting towards GNG or indicating corporate significance in a quick Google dance... Carrite (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.