Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell Seagull and Seamew


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. W.marsh 23:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Bell Seagull and Seamew
Fails to assert notability. Contested prod. MER-C 12:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Added reference of 'notability' - more to be added soon. User:Niall1798 13:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Frankly I would also have contested a prod on this. I am not saying the original nominator showed bad faith, merely that the subject is clearly notable -- Simon Cursitor 13:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but have just copyvio'd this as part of the text is a direct lift from the external link QuiteUnusual 21:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Text not directly lifted, but I've edited this section anyway Niall1798 10:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Krakatoa  Katie  07:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per QuiteUnusual. --Marriedtofilm 02:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.