Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bella Goth (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Per Articles for deletion/Mortimer Goth; Snow'ed in September. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  00:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Bella Goth
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not assert notability outside of the its video game appearances. It is unlikely that any third party sources will ever talk about it outside of the context of the games, so it has no reason to exist. TTN (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no way in this world that a proper article could ever be written on her. The in-game allusions to her are just gimmicky and aren't important to the gameplay (what is in The Sims?). – sgeureka t•c 13:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I like the page that seems to be the first thing you look for in pages to delete. Smurai   Cerberus  14:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Mortimer Goth. Nifboy (talk) 14:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of substantial verifiable info. Even the official strategy guide didn't have much to say about her, the Goths are essentially just the default neighbours.  Besides, it's simple logic that if there was consensus to delete Mortimer, Bella should go too. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball Delete per recent AfD on Mortimer Goth. MuZemike (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball Delete per above. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.