Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bella Rosenfeld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. – Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 02:10, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Bella Rosenfeld
Not noteworthy +/- vanity. Ifnord 04:54, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Vanity page. Mr. Tibbs 07:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No content. freshgavin  ΓΛĿЌ  07:02, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * She wrote quite a nice book about herself and Marc Chagall and appeared on the most of his paintings. It might be worth to safe her. As it is now the article is not useful. abakharev 07:51, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I have rewritten it. I would say keep abakharev 12:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work. It's a very good start. --Jacquelyn Marie 16:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lots of hits on Google. Book, etc. It's not so full right now, but it can be filled. -- WB 08:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if she is notable, the current contents are useless. Wikipedia is not paper, and so deleting an article now doesn't prevent recreating the article later. When someone actually has more information about Rosenfeld than her name and relationship to Chagall, they can write an article then. &mdash; J I P | Talk 08:51, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to keep after rewrite by User:Alex Bakharev. &mdash; J I P | Talk 14:02, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No content. KNewman 10:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep after User:Alex Bakharev's work on the article. Uppland 12:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. There's more there than most stubs right now, but I know there could be a lot more. (Note to admins: if it would help create consensus later, I'd also be okay with a merge to Marc Chagall.) --Jacquelyn Marie 16:02, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Factual, verifiable and neutral. Trollderella 16:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Alex Bakharev's rewrite. Notable enough for mine due to her connection with Chagall and her biography. Capitalistroadster 19:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep after rewrite. &there4; here&hellip;&spades; 20:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten. MCB 21:41, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy keep after rewrite by User:Alex Bakharev. --Irpen 02:03, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep thanks to Alex Bakharev. Nice work. freshgavin  ΓΛĿЌ  02:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.