Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellingham Slam

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 22:51, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Bellingham Slam
Poor definition, does not attempt to make itself a reasonable stub. Could have been a fruitful topic, but alas, I don't even seem to get the context? Weak delete. Natalinasmpf 00:58, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and make into stub. The article references the website of the subject basketball team. Gwk 01:01, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Link within article seems to make context clear.  Dcarrano 01:26, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as per above two reasons. -mysekurity 01:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as per above. royblumy 05:15, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand per above. --Briangotts 18:15, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Apparently, modern ABA "market rights" can be purchased for $10,000 to $20,000. As such, I'm not certain how notable any modern ABA team is prior to actually putting a team on the floor. Note, if you have $75, you can try out for the Slam! --Habap 21:05, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand It's a stub that can be expanded. --Neigel von Teighen 21:08, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand Its definately expandable. --Djsasso 22:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.