Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belron US


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Wifione  Message 06:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Belron US

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete or possibly merge into a Belron article. It is a non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article needs a lot of work, but Safelite is a big operation. Hoover's says its annual sales are $414 million. - Eureka Lott 01:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Is that sufficient to be notable for WP? Also, to call it a "big operation" is subjective. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:CORP doesn't offer much guidance when it comes to corporate size, but I think there are more than enough secondary sources to demonstrate the company's notability. - Eureka Lott 00:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Since it is always easy to find refs for a company we will end up with article on HUGE numbers of companies. I know WP is not paper but the admin overhead and bias would be a real problem. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Safelight is a big corporation, this article is cretainly legnthy enough, just does not provide enough sources, I would love to defend this article, but it needs a few more citations first. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.