Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Beme

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism coined about a month or so ago by a random blogger. Despite the claimed influence, this is nowhere near being on a par with Dawkins' concept yet. Most of the references are also evidently either bogus or misplaced (I'm not seeing the relevance in citing papers and books from the late 1950s to a word invented earlier this year for a concept which has emerged equally recently). Chris cheese whine 20:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable neologism.--Paloma Walker 00:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Bemete Pavel Vozenilek 07:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JuJube 23:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbustoo 00:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.