Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben-Jamin Newham (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 05:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Ben-Jamin Newham
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's obvious that the BLP is not a appropriate target for inclusion, however I'm requesting a specific no-speedy AfD so that we can use CSD:G4 on future re-creations (as the creator has threatened to do) Hasteur (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I originally deleted this article as CSD, but restored it by request of uninvolved editor. The article has no reliable references (IMDb only) and no assertion of notability. Has been speedied under a slightly different title on two previous occasions.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:31, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and possibly salt for six months or so - I consider the comments at the first nomination to be blatant attacks, we should resolve this with respect. I understand this user is unfamiliar with Wikipedia procedures but that is not an excuse to behave that way. I found this which lists quite a bit of work under "acting", "model" and "dancing" but I haven't found any reliable third-party sources aside from this (website for a Michael Jackson tribute show in which Ben stars) and this (blog for a theatre production, Fools In Progress). He seems to be talented and has achieved good work and I am sure he will receive additional work possibly enough for an article but there must be reliable third-party sources to establish notability. I'm voting delete with absolutely no prejudice towards a future notable article. In response to the author's comment about Sophie Lowe, it seems the works Blame and Beautiful Kate and AFI award should keep her article for now. SwisterTwister   talk  23:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per all above  Jay Jay What did I do? 23:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as per above. Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT per the above. Propose a SNOW close. ukexpat (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Not to be a process/policy wonk, but I suspect that the creator of the article may object to the deletion on potentially reasonable grounds, therefore the SNOW may not be appropriate. I note that the creator is on a 1 week block for reintroducing bad articles.  It would be appropriate to let the process ride all the way out so that the consensus is iron-clad. Hasteur (talk) 02:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete — ΛΧΣ  21  03:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete For the same reasons I listed at the original AFD: a new actor with only a few bit parts to his credit. Not yet. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:NOT YET (actors). Minimal career fails WP:ENT. Lack of coverage fails WP:GNG. Allow back only if or when this actor gets a few significant roles or finally gets gets significant coverage.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.