Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Ali Apartments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Ben Ali Apartments

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV and article makes no claim that there is historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, promo material, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings.  // Timothy ::  talk  04:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  04:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  04:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I was prepared to delete a non-notable apartment building, but a proposed non-notable apartment building? Definitely! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge/Delete Could be a subsection in the article on the courthouse now at the site, but it doesn't have an article. Best to delete it for now. Oaktree b (talk) 16:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NBUILD. A classic case of WP:MILL. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly fails NBUILD and GNG Spiderone  19:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I have doubts this would have been notable even if it had been built, being unbuilt it is clearly not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.