Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Benson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted (G3). Alexf42 22:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Ben Benson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant hoax as a quick google search shows. Speedy declined by an IP. Nsk92 (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, please look through the history log of this page. The description of the subject of the article, whomever he is supposed to be (actor, businessman,...), is changing almost by the second. This was the version at the time of the AfD nom: . Nsk92 (talk) 15:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * speedy delete as hoax. P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 15:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Easy call. --Quartermaster (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Hoax/vandalism. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (A1) — While not pure vandalism as required per G3 (it has to be evident that all versions of the article are to be considered vandalism), there is no context whatsoever and easily fits the A1 criterion for speedy deletion. MuZemike (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Not often you get such an evident hoax article semi-prot'd from all the vandalism thrown at it. treelo  radda  17:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Tagged as A1 after a few moments of deliberation. Also endorse blocks on the anons and registered editors in what seems like a co-ordinated attack. treelo  radda  21:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete and block various editors. The number of attack edits in the edit history is ridiculous. I recommend that some blocks be handed out to the editors or IPs responsible for them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, hoax. Plus, the amount of attacks is getting ridiculous. RockManQ (talk) 21:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   — treelo  radda  21:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.