Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Guez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep with no prejdjudice against renomination.. Rlendog (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Ben Guez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual, fails GNG. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - The nominator is now blocked for launching a spree of listing more than 100 AfDs wrongly at baseball-related deletion discussions page. &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 06:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - He was part of the Israel national team and played the Qualification Round to the 2013 World Baseball Classic, loosing in the pool's final. He is also recipient of a player of the season and an all star award for his performance in the minor league. Other than that he seems to have received coverage from various independent sources, more than other minor league players receive which in my view may make him slightly pass WP:GNG. &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 06:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes GNG. Which is our main test. Has substantial coverage in RSs. Epeefleche (talk) 08:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Something weird going on. The nom is now indef-blocked. See here. I suggest, since he is not an editor in good standing, that this AfD be closed (as there are no editor in good standing !votes or nominations for deletion). Should he come back as an editor in good standing, it can be revived. Epeefleche (talk) 08:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.