Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Kimmel

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was SPEEDY. jni 19:59, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ben Kimmel
How did the new article patrol miss this nugget of non-notability --nixie 23:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 23:58, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy. There's no way this is going to survive, so a speedy deletion would save us all some time. Hopefully there's an admin out there who's willing to stretch the rules slightly. This is obviously a delete vote, anyway. -R. fiend 00:01, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Extreme vanity. Zzyzx11 02:21, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * That was definitely a speedy. Did the deed. Surprised there was even a question about it. Bearcat 05:04, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)