Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Lee (violinist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrClog (talk) 13:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Ben_Lee_(violinist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is blatant advertising of the individual and his business News &#38; Old (talk) 09:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment WP:PROMO issues aside, there are some decent sources.. Not amazing, but still. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources cited provide adequate evidence of notability. The promotional tone can be fixed – it's not a reason to delete. Maproom (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - clear claim(s) to notability supported by multiple reliable sources. Even if the article is too promotional in tone, AFD is not cleanup. Hugsyrup (talk) 12:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep and close - Very easily meets WP:GNG, there are multiple sources on the Google. Nominator seems to be a newbie, needs to learn what is notable and what is not. It is clearly wasting time of people here. 14.98.207.62 (talk) 10:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep- I completely agree with Maproom, sufficient RS, meets WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the article, it looks notable as its sources.Forest90 (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.