Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Resner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Ben Resner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only a few WP:ROUTINE local sources covering his hirings and some stats pages. Fails WP:NHOOPS by not head coaching in a well covered league, Canada isn't exactly a big basketball country in terms of media coverage or attendance. Yosemiter (talk) 18:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet our overly permissive notability guidelines for basketball players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. However, it is a laughable cheap shot to say that our basketball guidelines are overly permissive. The men’s guideline is for six domestic leagues (including predecessor leagues), three pan European leagues, first and second round NBA draft picks and stat leaders/major award winners for two top minor leagues. These are probably some of the least expansive Sports SSG guidelines. The truth is that many more basketball figures than this meet GNG because there is high interest in the sport from a number of countries. Rikster2 (talk) 12:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage from independent sources. Assistant coaches aren't inherently notable per WP:NHOOPS.—Bagumba (talk) 08:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.