Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Scotchbrook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Ben Scotchbrook

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at WP:CREATIVE (which includes journalists), hasn't been widely cited by peers or successors, no new concepts/techniques/major roles/critical attention or significant contributions. ƒ(Δ)² 08:30, 24 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - no sources means he fails WP:N which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". He also doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria at WP:CREATIVE, even if the article was appropriately sourced.  Finally, WP:BLP recommends the immediate deletion of all unsourced statements from biographies of living people, which in this case woudl require blanking the article as there are no sources. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 03:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.