Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Wa balls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. 2 months is long enough for this AFD, noone seems to care (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Ben Wa balls

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is a whole mess and should be deleted. or redirected to the page Sex Toys Nothing in this article is really certifiable and has remained that way for a long time now. Unless we can find reliable sources to back up the claims on this article or facts, I say we remove it because the Sex Toy article is more appropriate for something like Ben Wa Balls. Just my opinion. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 08:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. Just because something is unsourced doesn't mean that it is unsourceable. I believe that the subject is notable, and that we can easily document that with a google search - which I might do later on today. Being in need of cleanup is not itself a reason for deletion. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.