Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benbansi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Benbansi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 09:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * If not independently notable, merge to List of Rajput clans of Uttar Pradesh. North America1000 10:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Struck my !vote avbove. Neutral at this time. North America1000 21:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - the "list of clans" articles are gradually being pruned to those that meet WP:V and the spirit of WP:NLIST. Clan names often exist in more than one caste grouping and in more than one location, so accurate redirecting is impossible. Source checks suggest that this particular community does not appear to meet WP:GNG. - Sitush (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are some hits on Gbooks but they are mostly inaccessible and available in snippet view; unable to figure out if it has passing mentions or some kind of substantial coverage. It seems to be related to some King Ben .  Anup   [Talk]  17:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Those are Raj era sources. They are not reliable. - Sitush (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Anup   [Talk]  08:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- same rationale as Bargaiyan; dubious. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:DEL7. I insist on scholarly sources for ethnicity related articles. This one doesn't make the cut. I am aware that colonial era sources are not considered reliable and neither am I able to find contemporary academic sources. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.