Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bence Varga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Bence Varga

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A footballer that has played either 9 minutes or 8 minutes of professional football depending on whether you trust HLSZ or Soccerway more. In any case, this is a very thin passing of WP:NFOOTBALL. A Hungarian search as well as Google searches using both Hungarian name order and Western name order did not yield any useful coverage about this particular player, so I see no evidence that WP:GNG is met. Strong consensus now that such thin passes of NFOOTBALL are not enough when GNG is failed. The player has now spent a decade languishing in the lower tiers of Hungarian football without picking up any significant coverage and it seems highly unlikely that they will ever return to the professional level. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not even close to meeting any reasonable inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Was even deleted from the Hungarian wiki due to lack of notability after a quick search. SteveBrownIreland (talk) 10:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. Notability is not established. While he has an article on the Arabic wiki as well, it doesn't even contain any sources whatsoever (I have no grasp on Arabic, but the lack of sources are still clear as the sky). GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.