Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benedict Clarke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. When his career develops enough to meet the notability rrequirementsa, then and only then, rewrite the article  DGG ( talk ) 21:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Benedict Clarke

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. Actor, only one minor role is asserted, BLP PROD contested with the man's IMDB entry. Not sufficient to pass either WP:BIO or WP:ENTERTAINER. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 22:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Harry Potter cast members per WP:BLP1E. Some non-substantial coverage is revealed in a Google News search, but there's no coverage in GBooks or the like.  HurricaneFan 25  22:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect as above per WP:TOOSOON. Just one role in his career ever fails WP:ENT, and what coverage that is available is for this BLP1E.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect without prejudice against expansion one subject becomes notable - Per above. Clearly not notable YET! Give it some time Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 01:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * KEEP Many people will like to read his page and if it is kept then his new roles can be added. It has been too recently added to get gotten rid of — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.172.101 (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Please read the essay WP:TOOSOON: I believe it reflects a strong consensus among Wikipedia editors that we don't write articles on people who might someday meet our notability guidelines, hoping that they will. Instead, we wait until they do meet our guidelines before we create the article. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as having been insufficient in-depth coverage by independent third-party sources. If links are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.