Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beneffy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 05:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Beneffy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a VOIP company founded in 2010. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 13:33, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Article history shows only one non-minor contributor (Mentax), who has made no other edits (even minor ones) to other articles – he's most likely affiliated with the company. Article looks like a giant ad. —Prof. Squirrel (talk) 17:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: As others have said above, the current text reads like a feature ad for prospective customers. While that could be fixed by normal editing, I can find no evidence that the firm meets the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Interesting, I check other pages like phonepower and build page for my company. If you think it's a advertising please delete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phone_Power as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mentax (talk • contribs) 23:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; and WP:COI. AllyD (talk)
 * - there is a conflict of interest issue, but the bigger problem -- and why it would be up for deletion even if someone else wrote it -- is because it doesn't establish notability. Phone Power, on the other hand, cites several reliable, independent sources (or appears to -- I haven't scrutinized). --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  22:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG. Odd, because I can hear the name in my head as though it's widely known, but indeed there are no GNews results and I'm not seeing much otherwise, either. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  22:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.