Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benefits of Using Signed Exact English in the Classroom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. There were two suggestions that something could be merged, but nobody specified what should be merged, and that leaves those votes too vague. The consensus is that the article is an essay, and essays are generally not particularily merge-able. Note that there is already an "advantages" section in the Signing Exact English article, and the title here is a inplausible search term. Sjakkalle (Check!)  16:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Benefits of Using Signed Exact English in the Classroom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an essay and doesn't seem to contain anything but the types of pro-con lists we like to avoid. Maybe some of the contained sources could be useful. Yaksar (let's chat) 06:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal, advocative essay. J I P  &#124; Talk 07:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - surely this could be added as a subsection of Signing Exact English. It seems to be sourced, although not wikified. JoshuSasori (talk) 07:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * This is an original essay. If parts of it can be merged to Signed Exact English, fine. Otherwise, it should be deleted as original research and advocacy for one point of view in controversial SEE/ASL education debates. Cnilep (talk) 03:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 04:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)




 * Merge and Redirect Per above  Jay Jay Talk to me 01:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Just delete. Nothing worth salvaging for a merge. Angr (talk) 10:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. This Article is obviously a personal essay. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 07:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.