Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mid-level bureaucrat, no significant coverage, anything available (within or outside of the article) is just of the bureaucrat postings and transfers notifications from the relevant govt department. Doesn't meet any of our SNGs either &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - this Article is a pure Dependanat article on "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swathi_Lakra", So , it depends on the consensus of the that particluar article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramsinghdeena (talk • contribs) 09:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited. So no, if he doesn't get over one of our notability standards on his own steam, then the fact of being married to someone else who might qualify for a Wikipedia article does not give him an automatic exemption from those standards. Bearcat (talk) 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing actually suggesting better for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable source coverage shown at all — even the one source which actually constitutes real media coverage fails to even verify the claim being cited to it, as it doesn't actually mention his name at all. It supports the claim that his wife happens to hold a particular position, but fails to even verify the claim that he's married to her. Bearcat (talk) 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.