Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benier Koranache


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Not Allowed
This page is "Wikipedia" Garbage data. Our company has contacted Wiki representatives in Florida and this reference has been sited as simple harassment. There is no reason for this reference and should NOT be considered reliable information. the authour of the article had INVITED "graham" to show examples of BETTER articles _ but "graham" has chosen to make this a personal issue? we have NO idea what his agenda is. "graham" has REFUSED to send any EXAMPLES of the "the perfect article" for a BIO on this site. Can someone else show us a CONSTRUCTIVE, credible example? Go read Bill Bernbachs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Bernbach) article or Jay Chiat's... (on this site) Are those VANITY? OR are they BIOS of successful people - you've NEVER heard of or have no interest in hearing of? there are THOUSANDS that DO have interest in this information. (User:Not Allowed 00:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC))
 * Delete either its self-authored and violates WP:VANITY or its not and is copyvio from [Not Allowedl]. In either case its spam.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  11:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, selfvertising. NawlinWiki 14:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Have a look at How_to_write_a_great_article and Featured_articles  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  00:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

now THATS a sound, straight forward reference comment. (it) no presumptions, no personal bias (apparently) .. and no bizarre jealousy. Merci, Dlyons493! we'll check it out. (User:Not Allowed 01:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)) Please do not accuse the nominator or any other users of having an "agenda", "personal bias" or "bizarre jealousy".
 * Delete as a violation of WP:BIO and WP:VANITY, as well as fairly obvious advertising.  Srose  (talk)  13:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inappropriate tone; written like an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia article. WP:VANITY is not grounds for deletion, but it sure as heck doesn't help either. Kickaha Ota 17:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I get only 79 google hits on his name, and most of them are things like letters and reviews that he has posted. There is a mention of him in the ad industry mag "'boards", but it is a one sentence "Not Allowed." sort of thing. Brianyoumans 18:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.