Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Beresford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Benjamin Beresford

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article which likely fails WP:NACTOR. A child actor who only appeared in one series (Coronation Street) in a recurring role and has not had any other roles since. There is little, if any, media coverage about him and the article's only source is an archived profile of the character he played on the series' official website with no information on the actor himself. Koljanc (talk) 15:44, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television,  and United Kingdom.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, absolutely agree with the nomination, this is someone who played a child actor with no significant or notable storylines and who has no acting credits since. The article was created at a time when these kind of articles were more passable, however there is nothing here to suggest an article is warranted. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there is a reason why the guidlines ask for multiple significant roles. One role, that may or may not have actually been significant, does not cut it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Gbooks has a hit, in French, from 1782. nothing notable here.Oaktree b (talk) 00:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There's one mention in The Sun (I think it was), a tabloid about the 60 years of Coronation Street, and he hardly gets a mention. Not notable at all. Oaktree b (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ACTOR. Scraped Google for WP:SIGCOV and it’s not there. NiklausGerard (talk) 21:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.